Sycamore Financial Group

/Sycamore Financial Group
Sycamore Financial Group

About Sycamore Financial Group

This author has not yet filled in any details.
So far Sycamore Financial Group has created 13 blog entries.

Indiana Inheritance Tax Repeal

Good news on the tax front if you are an Indiana resident. And better still if you are an Indiana resident’s beneficiary. Indiana’s inheritance tax will be completely repealed by year 2022. Starting in the year 2013, the tax will be reduced by 10% each year until it phases out entirely by 2022.

The current tax rate for Class “A” beneficiaries is from 1% to 10%. Class “A” beneficiaries include parents, children, stepchildren, grandparents, grandchildren, other linear descendants and other lineal ancestors and spouses of children or stepchildren. For these beneficiaries, the exemption has been increased from $100,000 to $250,000.

Class “B” beneficiaries, which include brothers, sisters and lineal descendants of brothers and sisters, currently pay a tax-rate between 7% and 15%. The exemption amount for this group remains at $500.

Class “C” beneficiaries, which include everyone who is not a class “A” or “B” beneficiary, are currently subject to tax rates between 10% and 20%. The exemption for this group remains at $100. This is not a typo. It’s $100. Indiana’s Inheritance Tax law is retroactive to January 1, 2012. Of course, spouses and charities are entirely tax exempt.

Comments contained above are meant to be generic in nature and are not meant for specific action.

By |2012-10-10T21:14:41+00:00October 10th, 2012|Craig's Commentary 2012|0 Comments

What Does A Share of Stock Really Represent? – Fall 2012

We strongly encourage our clients to meet with us once a year. We do this for several reasons. Your investment portfolio reflects the short and long-term financial goals you’ve set for yourself. These objectives are a moving target. As you close on one goal and look to the next, we may need to rebalance your portfolio. We are often asked during an annual review whether a portfolio comprised primarily of stock is adequately diversified. This is a very good question.

When you own shares of stock in a company, your investment is with the company represented by the shares you own – not with the stock itself. Here is a simple example. Let’s say that you and I decide to buy a 100-acre farm in Howard County. We could choose many ways to own this farm. We may own it as a partnership, as joint tenants or… we could elect to form a company and issue shares of stock to ourselves that would represent our relative ownership of the farm. We would then be ‘stockholders’ but would we be invested in the ‘stock market’? Well…I guess we could call it that but since our company’s only business is to own 100 acres of farmland in Howard County, you and I as shareholders would actually be invested in farmland. The number of shares we hold (which represent the overall percentage of individual ownership) make distribution calculations simpler at the end of the year. And should the need arise, the shares are also a convenient way to sell some of our farmland to another investor. Bottom line: our money was not invested in stock but in farmland. The stock is simply an easy, and potentially a more liquid way, to own the farm. It’s easy to look through the stock ownership in our farm to the actual business of owning the farmland. This is the same way that we look through the stocks in your portfolio and focus on their business operations.

So… if your portfolio with Sycamore is all or mostly stocks, just what do you own? When we build portfolios from scratch, we generally purchase about 45 or 50 different companies. The percentage of your ownership is represented by the number of shares of stock that you own in each of the companies. But your actual investment is in the operations of the given companies.

We usually spread your total investment over all sectors of the economy. We do not try to guess which sector will be the best performer. Within your portfolio, you will likely own shares in companies that produce basic materials such as chemicals and steel. You may have equity positions in companies that drill for oil or produce electricity. Other companies you hold may produce a wide range of grain products or even soap – staples of modern life. You’ll have shares in companies that own and operate real estate holding, ideally in different regional markets. Additionally, you will likely own some small, medium and large companies.

Our goal is to keep you broadly diversified in all sectors of the economy. It’s the best way we know to fend off the unknown risks that are always coming down the road. In the future when other investors speak of being invested in the stock market…you can correct them.

Running the numbers…

I’d like to leave you with one last thought. Because we are wholly focused on the fundamentals of the companies that you own, we do not pay much attention to the “stock market” as a whole. We asked ourselves several key questions about a company before any recommendation or purchase.

  • Is this company well managed?
  • Does this company make a good product that is needed?
  • Has this company demonstrated consistent growth of dividends and earnings?
  • How much debt does this company carry?

You’ve probably got the picture. We believe that numbers are a better and certainly more objective measure of a company’s potential profitability than a glossy prospectus. A picture may be worth a thousand words, but I’ll take a balance sheet any day of the week. Take it from someone who’s been in the game for nearly 40 years, predicting the U.S. or any international market is a fool’s errand. At Sycamore, we gather data, crunch numbers, draw conclusions and act on the result.


Comments contained above are meant to be generic in nature and are not meant for specific action.

By |2012-10-02T21:46:29+00:00October 2nd, 2012|Craig's Commentary 2012|0 Comments

Multi-Taskers from Old

A couple of weeks ago, I began reading Daniel Patrick Forrester’s book, “Consider”. The book tackles the question of how well the average person processes the tremendous amount of data that pours into our conscious mind each day and why we need to actively include periods of reflective thinking in our daily routine. Forrester’s book includes some fascinating information about multi-tasking.

Multi-taskers are in high demand across the board. In fact, the ability to juggle several tasks simultaneously happens to be one trait that successful fry cooks and Fortune 500 CEO’s share. But how well does the average person multi-task? Not well, according to Stanford researcher Richard Nass, who has conducted multiple studies on the topic. While 2.5% of the population can multi-task effectively, the rest of us simply wind up doing two things poorly. My experience has convinced me that I am not one of the lucky 2.5%; I need to concentrate on one task at a time.

About one hour after finishing “Consider”, something interesting happened. I picked up a book that was owned by Susan’s grandmother, Josephine Jack.entitled “1000 Inspirational Things”. (Not my usual read, but it caught my eye that day.) Complied in 1957 by Audrey Stone Morris, this book included the following quote attributed to Syrus on page 13:

“To do two things at once is to do neither.”

After my previous read, I was interested to learn more about this Syrus fellow. Turns out Syrus, who was a favorite of Julius Caesar, made his observation on multitasking in 46 BC. Nothing changes!

Comments contained above are meant to be generic in nature and are not meant for specific action.

By |2012-09-29T21:12:54+00:00September 29th, 2012|Craig's Commentary 2012|0 Comments
Load More Posts